Subaru Forester vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Subaru Forester
$34,795
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Subaru Forester vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. Subaru Forester offers the strongest value on price. Subaru Forester leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Subaru Forester
Best Value
Subaru Forester
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Subaru Forester
$34,795
Rating: 4.7/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
Subaru Forester |
Honda CR-V |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Subaru | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | Forester | CR-V | Silverado 1500 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | Suv | — |
| Body Style | Compact Crossover SUV | Compact Crossover SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | $34,795 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $53,599 – $54,800 |
| MSRP | $34,795 | $38,650 | $54,800 |
| Dealer Price | $33,600 | $37,299 | $52,499 |
| Engine | 2.5L Direct-Injection SUBARU BOXER 4-Cylinder | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 |
| Horsepower | 180 hp | 190 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque | 178 lb-ft | 179 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 120 mph | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 28 MPG Combined (25 City / 32 Hwy) | 29 MPG combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | LEV3-SULEV30 Certified | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.7/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 142 | 1340 | 870 |
| Performance Score | 8.3 | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 9.4 | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | EyeSight Driver Assist Technology | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 25 mpg | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Technology Score | 9.5 | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Value Score | 9.2 | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Pros | Distinctive 19-inch bronze-finished alloy wheels and dark bronze exterior styling accents; Water-repellent StarTex seati... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... |
| Cons | Naturally aspirated 180 hp 2.5L engine offers adequate rather than exhilarating acceleration; 1,500 lb towing capacity i... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... |
