Land Rover Defender 110 vs Toyota RAV4
Land Rover Defender 110
$75,200
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Land Rover Defender 110 vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Land Rover Defender 110 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Land Rover Defender 110
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Land Rover Defender 110
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Land Rover Defender 110
$75,200
Rating: 4.8/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Land Rover Defender 110 |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Land Rover | Toyota |
| Model | Defender 110 | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | Mid-Size Luxury Off-Road SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $75,200 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $75,200 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $73,100 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 3.0L Turbocharged Inline-6 MHEV | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 395 hp | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 406 lb-ft | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 5.8 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 119 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline (Mild-Hybrid) | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 20 MPG Combined (18 City / 22 Hwy) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | LEV3-ULEV70 Certified | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 48V Mild-Hybrid Lithium-ion | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | N/A | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 168 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 9.2 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 9.5 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | 9.8 | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 18 mpg | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Smooth and muscular 395 hp P400 inline-6 MHEV powertrain with 8,200 lb towing capacity; Class-leading off-road geometry... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Fuel economy (20 MPG Combined) is typical for a heavy, boxy off-roader; Side-hinged rear tailgate with full-size spare r... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
