Land Rover Defender 110 vs Toyota Corolla
Land Rover Defender 110
$75,200
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Land Rover Defender 110 vs Toyota Corolla. Toyota Corolla offers the strongest value on price. Land Rover Defender 110 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Land Rover Defender 110
Best Value
Toyota Corolla
Fuel Economy
Toyota Corolla
Performance
Land Rover Defender 110
Toyota Corolla
4.6/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Land Rover Defender 110
$75,200
Rating: 4.8/10
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
Rating: 4.6/10
| Specification |
Land Rover Defender 110 |
Toyota Corolla |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Land Rover | Toyota |
| Model | Defender 110 | Corolla |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | Mid-Size Luxury Off-Road SUV | Compact Sedan |
| Current Price | $75,200 | $28,799 – $29,500 |
| MSRP | $75,200 | $29,500 |
| Dealer Price | $73,100 | $28,299 |
| Engine | 3.0L Turbocharged Inline-6 MHEV | 2.0L Dynamic Force Inline-4 |
| Horsepower | 395 hp | 169 hp |
| Torque | 406 lb-ft | 151 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 5.8 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 8.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 119 mph | Approx. 118 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline (Mild-Hybrid) | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 20 MPG Combined (18 City / 22 Hwy) | 35 MPG combined |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | LEV3-ULEV70 Certified | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 48V Mild-Hybrid Lithium-ion | N/A |
| Charging | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.6/10 |
| Community Reviews | 168 | 1680 |
| Performance Score | 9.2 | 8.0 |
| Comfort Score | 9.5 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | 9.8 | 9.3 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 18 mpg | 9.2 |
| Technology Score | 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Value Score | 9.0 | 9.1 |
| Pros | Smooth and muscular 395 hp P400 inline-6 MHEV powertrain with 8,200 lb towing capacity; Class-leading off-road geometry... | Excellent reliability reputation; Strong fuel economy; Comprehensive standard safety features; Affordable ownership and... |
| Cons | Fuel economy (20 MPG Combined) is typical for a heavy, boxy off-roader; Side-hinged rear tailgate with full-size spare r... | Rear-seat space is moderate for tall adults; Performance is adequate but not sporty; Some premium tech requires higher t... |
