Kia Sportage Hybrid vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Kia Sportage Hybrid
$36,800
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Kia Sportage Hybrid vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. Kia Sportage Hybrid offers the strongest value on price. Kia Sportage Hybrid leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Kia Sportage Hybrid
Best Value
Kia Sportage Hybrid
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Kia Sportage Hybrid
$36,800
Rating: 8.7/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
Kia Sportage Hybrid |
Honda CR-V |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Kia | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | Sportage Hybrid | CR-V | Silverado 1500 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Suv | Suv | — |
| Body Style | 5-door compact crossover suv | Compact Crossover SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | $36,800 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $53,599 – $54,800 |
| MSRP | $36,800 | $38,650 | $54,800 |
| Dealer Price | $35,400 | $37,299 | $52,499 |
| Engine | 1.6L Turbocharged Inline 4-Cylinder Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 |
| Horsepower | 232 | 190 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque | 271 lb-ft @ 1600-4000 RPM | 179 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 7.1s 0-60 mph estimate | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 120 mph | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Regular Unleaded Permitted (87 Octane) | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | — | 29 MPG combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) |
| Range (EV) | 0 miles | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | ULEV70 Certified | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 1.49 kWh Lithium-Ion Polymer Traction Battery (270V) | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | On-the-fly engine generation and adaptive multi-stage regenerative paddle shifting | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 8.7/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1340 | 870 |
| Performance Score | 8.6 | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.5 | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | — | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Fuel Economy Score | — | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Technology Score | 8.9 | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Value Score | — | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Pros | New vertical LED headlight array and clean grille restructuring deliver a highly sophisticated premium presence; Class-l... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... |
| Cons | Lower rear trim components use heavy grained plastic elements that feel slightly stiff; The standard SynTex seating mate... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... |
