Audi Q7 vs Toyota RAV4
Audi Q7
$73,200
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Audi Q7 vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Audi Q7 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Audi Q7
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Audi Q7
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Audi Q7
$73,200
Rating: 8.9/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Audi Q7 |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | Q7 | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Suv | — |
| Body Style | 5-door luxury mid-size 3-row suv | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $73,200 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $73,200 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $70,800 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 3.0L V6 Turbocharged Gas with 48V Mild Hybrid Architecture | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 335 | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 369 lb-ft @ 1370-4500 RPM | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 5.5s 0-60 mph | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 130 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Premium Unleaded Recommended | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | — | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 0 miles | N/A |
| Emissions | SULEV30 Certified | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 0.48 kWh 48V Lithium-Ion Mild-Hybrid Battery | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | Engine deceleration and kinetic braking energy recuperation | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 8.9/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | — | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | — | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | — | 9.2 |
| Pros | Newly standard adaptive air suspension delivers exemplary ride isolation and road-filtering comfort; Smooth 3.0-liter tu... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Third-row passenger legroom is best suited for children during long-distance travels; Cargo volume behind the third row... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
