Subaru BRZ vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Subaru BRZ
$35,860
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Subaru BRZ vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. Subaru BRZ offers the strongest value on price. Subaru BRZ leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Subaru BRZ
Best Value
Subaru BRZ
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Subaru BRZ
$35,860
Rating: 4.8/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
Subaru BRZ |
Honda CR-V |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Subaru | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | BRZ | CR-V | Silverado 1500 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | Suv | — |
| Body Style | Coupe | Compact Crossover SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | $35,860 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $53,599 – $54,800 |
| MSRP | $35,860 | $38,650 | $54,800 |
| Dealer Price | $35,000 | $37,299 | $52,499 |
| Engine | 2.4-liter Naturally Aspirated 4-cylinder SUBARU BOXER | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 |
| Horsepower | 228 hp @ 7000 RPM | 190 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque | 184 lb-ft @ 3700 RPM | 179 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | Approx. 5.9 seconds (0-60 mph) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 140 mph | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Premium Unleaded (required) | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 20 mpg city / 27 mpg highway (Manual) / 30 mpg highway (Automatic) | 29 MPG combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | Low emission vehicle standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | Standard 12V automotive battery | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1340 | 870 |
| Performance Score | 9.2 | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 7.5 | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | 8.8 | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.0 | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Technology Score | 8.5 | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Value Score | 9.5 | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Pros | Engaging handling and low center of gravity; Standard TORSEN limited-slip differential; Crisp 6-speed manual transmissio... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... |
| Cons | Cramped rear seats primarily suited for luggage; Firm ride quality can feel stiff on rough roads; Engine lacks low-end t... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... |
