Seres Aito M9 vs Toyota RAV4
Seres Aito M9
$63,999 – $65,000
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Seres Aito M9 vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Seres Aito M9 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Seres Aito M9
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Seres Aito M9
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Seres Aito M9
$63,999 – $65,000
Rating: 4.8/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Seres Aito M9 |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Seres | Toyota |
| Model | Aito M9 | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $63,999 – $65,000 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $65,000 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $61,999 | $35,199 |
| Engine | Dual Motor AWD / 1.5T EREV Option | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 530 - 890 hp | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 675 Nm | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 4.0 - 4.3 sec (0-100 km/h) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 200 - 251 km/h | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric / Gasoline Range Extender | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 22.2 kWh / 100 km | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 630 - 750 km CLTC | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/km (EV mode) | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 100 kWh CATL | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | 290 kW DC fast charging | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 9.2 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | Emergency Steering & Forward AEB | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Advanced Huawei HarmonyOS ecosystem; Ultra-fast 800V charging platform; Luxurious multi-screen interior layout; Top-tier... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Large footprint can be challenging in tight spaces; Ecosystem features deeply tied to specific software integrations; Av... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
