Scout Traveler vs Scout Motors Traveler vs Rivian R3 vs Scout Traveler
Scout Traveler
$50,000
Scout Motors Traveler
$60,000
Rivian R3
$38,000
Scout Traveler
$60,000
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Scout Traveler vs Scout Motors Traveler vs Rivian R3 vs Scout Traveler. Rivian R3 offers the strongest value on price. Scout Traveler leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Scout Traveler
Best Value
Rivian R3
Fuel Economy
Scout Traveler
Performance
Scout Traveler
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Scout Traveler
$50,000
Rating: 4.8/10
Scout Motors Traveler
$60,000
Rating: 4.6/10
Rivian R3
$38,000
Rating: 4.6/10
Scout Traveler
$60,000
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Scout Traveler |
Scout Motors Traveler |
Rivian R3 |
Scout Traveler |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Scout | Scout Motors | Rivian | Scout |
| Model | Traveler | Traveler | R3 | Traveler |
| Year | 2027 | 2027 | 2027 | 2027 |
| Type | Ev | Ev | Ev | Ev |
| Body Style | Rugged SUV | SUV | Compact Crossover | SUV |
| Current Price | $50,000 | $60,000 | $38,000 | $60,000 |
| MSRP | $50,000 | $60,000 | $38,000 | $60,000 |
| Dealer Price | $50,000 | $58,000 | $37,500 | $58,000 |
| Engine | Dual-Motor Electric 4WD (Optional Gas Range Extender available) | Dual Electric Motors with Optional Gas Range Extender | Dual-Motor / Tri-Motor AWD | Dual-Motor Electric AWD |
| Horsepower | Estimated ~1,000 lb-ft torque equivalent | Estimated 450-550 hp | Up to 450+ hp (estimated) | Approx. 500 hp |
| Torque | 1,000+ lb-ft | Nearly 1,000 lb-ft | 600 Nm | 1,035 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 0-60 mph in roughly 3.5 seconds | 3.5 sec (0-60 mph) | Under 3.0 sec (0-60 mph for quickest config) | 3.5 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | Electronically limited | N/A | 180 km/h | 120 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric / Optional Gas Range Extender | Electric / Gas (EREV) | Electric | Electric |
| Mileage / MPG | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Range (EV) | Up to 350 miles (Pure EV) / 500+ miles (With Range Extender) | Up to 350 miles (Pure EV) / 500+ miles (Extended Range) | Over 300 miles EPA | Up to 350 miles EPA (Pure EV version) |
| Emissions | 0 g/mi (Pure EV mode) | 0 g/mi (Pure EV) / Low (EREV) | 0 g/mi | 0 g/mi |
| Battery | High-capacity custom pack | N/A | Up to 80 kWh | 100+ kWh |
| Charging | 350 kW DC Fast Charging | 350 kW DC fast charging | 250 kW DC (10-80% in 30 min via NACS) | 350 kW DC Fast Charging |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 9.5 | 9.2 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Safety Score | Standard Scout Safety Assist | 8.8 | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 9.0 |
| Technology Score | 9.2 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Value Score | 8.8 | 8.7 | 9.0 | 8.9 |
| Pros | Iconic rugged heritage styling; Stunning off-road geometry and high ground clearance; Massive towing and payload capacit... | Nearly 1,000 lb-ft of torque with 0-60 mph in 3.5 seconds; True body-on-frame platform with mechanical lockers; Optional... | Distinctive retro-futuristic hatchback styling; Over 300 miles of estimated range with larger battery pack; Native NACS... | Stunning retro-modern heritage design; Massive torque and rapid 0-60 acceleration; True body-on-frame off-road capabilit... |
| Cons | High demand may lead to extended waitlists; Heavy curb weight inherent to rugged EV platforms; Large physical footprint... | Production timeline stretches into 2027; Fuel economy for range extender variant pending final EPA testing; High demand... | Production timeline stretches further out; Exact trim pricing and final configurations subject to change; High demand ma... | High demand may lead to delivery waitlists; Large physical footprint for tight urban spaces; Efficiency impacted signifi... |
