Scout Terra vs Scout Motors Terra vs Rivian R3 vs Scout Traveler
Scout Terra
$58,750 – $60,000
Scout Motors Terra
$60,000
Rivian R3
$38,000
Scout Traveler
$60,000
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Scout Terra vs Scout Motors Terra vs Rivian R3 vs Scout Traveler. Rivian R3 offers the strongest value on price. Scout Terra leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Scout Terra
Best Value
Rivian R3
Fuel Economy
Scout Terra
Performance
Rivian R3
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Scout Terra
$58,750 – $60,000
Rating: 4.8/10
Scout Motors Terra
$60,000
Rating: 4.8/10
Rivian R3
$38,000
Rating: 4.6/10
Scout Traveler
$60,000
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Scout Terra |
Scout Motors Terra |
Rivian R3 |
Scout Traveler |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Scout | Scout Motors | Rivian | Scout |
| Model | Terra | Terra | R3 | Traveler |
| Year | 2027 | 2028 | 2027 | 2027 |
| Type | Ev | Ev | Ev | Ev |
| Body Style | Pickup Truck | Full-Size Pickup Truck | Compact Crossover | SUV |
| Current Price | $58,750 – $60,000 | $60,000 | $38,000 | $60,000 |
| MSRP | $60,000 | $60,000 | $38,000 | $60,000 |
| Dealer Price | $55,000 | $60,000 | $37,500 | $58,000 |
| Engine | Dual Motor Electric / Optional EREV (Gas Range Extender) | Dual-Motor AWD / Optional EREV Gas Generator | Dual-Motor / Tri-Motor AWD | Dual-Motor Electric AWD |
| Horsepower | Estimated ~1,000 lb-ft torque | TBC (Targeted high performance) | Up to 450+ hp (estimated) | Approx. 500 hp |
| Torque | 1,000 lb-ft | Up to 1,000 lb-ft | 600 Nm | 1,035 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 0-60 mph in 3.5 seconds | 4.7 sec (0-60 mph estimated) | Under 3.0 sec (0-60 mph for quickest config) | 3.5 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 110 mph | TBC | 180 km/h | 120 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric / Gas (Variant dependent) | Electric / Optional Gas Range Extender | Electric | Electric |
| Mileage / MPG | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Range (EV) | Up to 350 miles (BEV) / Over 500 miles (Cadence / EREV) | Up to 350 miles (Pure EV) / 500+ miles (Extended Range EREV) | Over 300 miles EPA | Up to 350 miles EPA (Pure EV version) |
| Emissions | 0 g/mi (BEV) / Low (EREV) | 0 g/mi (Pure EV) / Low (EREV) | 0 g/mi | 0 g/mi |
| Battery | Large-pack high-capacity EV battery | Estimated 120-130 kWh NMC (EV) / 60-70 kWh (EREV) | Up to 80 kWh | 100+ kWh |
| Charging | 800V architecture, up to 350 kW DC Fast Charging, NACS plug | Up to 350 kW DC (800V architecture) | 250 kW DC (10-80% in 30 min via NACS) | 350 kW DC Fast Charging |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.8/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 9.5 | 9.2 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.5 | 8.8 | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Safety Score | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.0 | 9.4 | 9.2 | 9.0 |
| Technology Score | 9.0 | 9.1 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Value Score | 8.9 | 9.2 | 9.0 | 8.9 |
| Pros | Over 10,000 lbs towing capacity; Available gas range extender (EREV) option; Massive off-road capability with 35-inch ti... | Up to 350 miles EV range or 500+ miles with range extender; 800V architecture with up to 350 kW DC fast charging; Front... | Distinctive retro-futuristic hatchback styling; Over 300 miles of estimated range with larger battery pack; Native NACS... | Stunning retro-modern heritage design; Massive torque and rapid 0-60 acceleration; True body-on-frame off-road capabilit... |
| Cons | Large footprint can be tricky in tight urban areas; High demand may lead to lengthy waitlists; Heavy weight impacts effi... | Production timeline stretches out to 2027; Exact battery capacities and final horsepower figures pending final confirmat... | Production timeline stretches further out; Exact trim pricing and final configurations subject to change; High demand ma... | High demand may lead to delivery waitlists; Large physical footprint for tight urban spaces; Efficiency impacted signifi... |
