Roewe iMAX8 EV vs Nissan Titan vs Hozon Neta GT
Roewe iMAX8 EV
$41,500 – $42,000
Nissan Titan
$53,580
Hozon Neta GT
$31,900
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Roewe iMAX8 EV vs Nissan Titan vs Hozon Neta GT. Hozon Neta GT offers the strongest value on price. Roewe iMAX8 EV leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Roewe iMAX8 EV
Best Value
Hozon Neta GT
Fuel Economy
Hozon Neta GT
Performance
Hozon Neta GT
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Roewe iMAX8 EV
$41,500 – $42,000
Rating: 4.6/10
Nissan Titan
$53,580
Rating: 4.1/10
Hozon Neta GT
$31,900
Rating: 4.3/10
| Specification |
Roewe iMAX8 EV |
Nissan Titan |
Hozon Neta GT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Roewe | Nissan | Hozon |
| Model | iMAX8 EV | Titan | Neta GT |
| Year | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 |
| Type | Ev | — | Ev |
| Body Style | MPV | Pickup | Coupe |
| Current Price | $41,500 – $42,000 | $53,580 | $31,900 |
| MSRP | $42,000 | $53,580 | $31,900 |
| Dealer Price | $40,500 | $51,900 | $30,500 |
| Engine | Single Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor | 5.6L DOHC 32-Valve Endurance V8 | Dual Motor AWD |
| Horsepower | 245 hp | 400 hp @ 5,800 rpm | 462 hp |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 413 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm | 620 Nm |
| 0–60 mph | Smooth electric delivery | 6.4 sec (0-60 mph) | 3.7 sec (0-100 km/h) |
| Top Speed | 180 km/h | 110 mph | 190 km/h |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Regular Unleaded Gasoline | Electric |
| Mileage / MPG | 16.2 kWh / 100 km | 16 MPGe combined (14 City / 20 Hwy) | 580 km CLTC |
| Range (EV) | 555 km CLTC | 520 miles total highway tank range | 580 km CLTC |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | 540 g/mi CO2 | 0 g/km |
| Battery | 90 kWh | 12V starter battery | 78 kWh |
| Charging | 30% to 80% in 30 min DC | N/A | DC Fast Charge (~30 min for 30-80%) |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.1/10 | 4.3/10 |
| Community Reviews | 45 | 840 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 8.4 | 8.5 | 9.2 |
| Comfort Score | 9.2 | 9.1 | 7.8 |
| Safety Score | ABS, ESC, AEB | Nissan Safety Shield 360 | 8.5 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.1 | 7.0 | 9.0 |
| Technology Score | 8.7 | 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Value Score | 8.9 | 8.6 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Spacious 7-seat layout with luxury amenities; Substantial 90 kWh battery offering good range; Smooth, quiet, and zero-em... | Standard 400 hp 5.6L V8 engine delivers strong performance; Ultra-comfortable NASA-inspired Zero Gravity front seats; Co... | Blistering 3.7s 0-100 km/h acceleration; Attractive entry-level pricing; Impressive 580 km CLTC range; Striking aerodyna... |
| Cons | Large footprint can be tricky in tight parking spots; Charging infrastructure availability depends on region; Limited gl... | Maximum towing capacity (9,290 lbs) is lower than class-leading full-size rivals; V8 fuel economy is lower than turbocha... | Tight rear seat headroom and legroom; Plastics dominate some interior touchpoints; Brand support and long-term network c... |
