Nio EC7 vs Nissan Titan vs Hozon Neta GT
Nio EC7
$63,999 – $64,510
Nissan Titan
$53,580
Hozon Neta GT
$31,900
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Nio EC7 vs Nissan Titan vs Hozon Neta GT. Hozon Neta GT offers the strongest value on price. Nio EC7 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Nio EC7
Best Value
Hozon Neta GT
Fuel Economy
Hozon Neta GT
Performance
Nio EC7
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Nio EC7
$63,999 – $64,510
Rating: 4.8/10
Nissan Titan
$53,580
Rating: 4.1/10
Hozon Neta GT
$31,900
Rating: 4.3/10
| Specification |
Nio EC7 |
Nissan Titan |
Hozon Neta GT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Nio | Nissan | Hozon |
| Model | EC7 | Titan | Neta GT |
| Year | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 |
| Type | Ev | — | Ev |
| Body Style | Coupe SUV | Pickup | Coupe |
| Current Price | $63,999 – $64,510 | $53,580 | $31,900 |
| MSRP | $64,510 | $53,580 | $31,900 |
| Dealer Price | $62,500 | $51,900 | $30,500 |
| Engine | Dual Motor AWD (Permanent Magnet Front / Induction Rear) | 5.6L DOHC 32-Valve Endurance V8 | Dual Motor AWD |
| Horsepower | 653 hp (480 kW) | 400 hp @ 5,800 rpm | 462 hp |
| Torque | 850 Nm | 413 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm | 620 Nm |
| 0–60 mph | 3.8 sec (0-100 km/h) | 6.4 sec (0-60 mph) | 3.7 sec (0-100 km/h) |
| Top Speed | 200 km/h | 110 mph | 190 km/h |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Regular Unleaded Gasoline | Electric |
| Mileage / MPG | 17.6 kWh / 100 km | 16 MPGe combined (14 City / 20 Hwy) | 580 km CLTC |
| Range (EV) | 635 km CLTC (100 kWh version) | 520 miles total highway tank range | 580 km CLTC |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | 540 g/mi CO2 | 0 g/km |
| Battery | 100 kWh | 12V starter battery | 78 kWh |
| Charging | DC Fast Charge 10-80% in 20 min | N/A | DC Fast Charge (~30 min for 30-80%) |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.1/10 | 4.3/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 840 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 9.4 | 8.5 | 9.2 |
| Comfort Score | 9.2 | 9.1 | 7.8 |
| Safety Score | 9.3 | Nissan Safety Shield 360 | 8.5 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 |
| Technology Score | 9.6 | 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Value Score | 8.8 | 8.6 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Blistering 3.8 second 0-100 km/h acceleration; World-class 0.230 Cd aerodynamics with active rear wing; Innovative swapp... | Standard 400 hp 5.6L V8 engine delivers strong performance; Ultra-comfortable NASA-inspired Zero Gravity front seats; Co... | Blistering 3.7s 0-100 km/h acceleration; Attractive entry-level pricing; Impressive 580 km CLTC range; Striking aerodyna... |
| Cons | Coupe roofline slightly reduces rear headroom compared to boxy siblings; Brand service network availability depends heav... | Maximum towing capacity (9,290 lbs) is lower than class-leading full-size rivals; V8 fuel economy is lower than turbocha... | Tight rear seat headroom and legroom; Plastics dominate some interior touchpoints; Brand support and long-term network c... |
