Mitsubishi Triton vs Toyota RAV4
Mitsubishi Triton
$40,999 – $42,000
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Mitsubishi Triton vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Toyota RAV4 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota RAV4
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Toyota RAV4
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Mitsubishi Triton
$40,999 – $42,000
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Mitsubishi Triton |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Triton | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | Pickup Truck | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $40,999 – $42,000 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $42,000 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $39,999 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 2.4L Bi-Turbo Diesel 4N16 | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 201 hp | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 470 Nm | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 9.5 sec (0-100 km/h) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 175 km/h | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 7.7 L/100 km | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | Euro 5 | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | N/A | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | N/A | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | 9.0 | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 7.7 L/100 km | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.9 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Powerful 2.4L bi-turbo diesel engine; Advanced Super Select 4WD-II system; Striking Athlete specific styling accents; Co... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Firm ride when unladen; Rear seat space is competitive but average for the class; Limited availability in certain global... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
