MG Cyberster vs Toyota RAV4
MG Cyberster
$60,000
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing MG Cyberster vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Toyota RAV4 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota RAV4
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
MG Cyberster
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
MG Cyberster
$60,000
Rating: 4.5/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
MG Cyberster |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | MG | Toyota |
| Model | Cyberster | RAV4 |
| Year | 2025 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | — |
| Body Style | Convertible Roadster | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $60,000 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $60,000 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $58,500 | $35,199 |
| Engine | Single Motor RWD / Dual Motor AWD | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | Up to 503 hp (Dual Motor configuration) | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 535 lb-ft (725 Nm) | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 3.2 seconds (0-60 mph for AWD model) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 125 mph - 师 155 mph depending on trim | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | N/A - Fully Electric | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | Up to 316 miles WLTP estimated | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/mi | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 77 kWh (Large pack option) | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | 150 kW DC Fast Charge | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.0 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Stunning design featuring operational scissor doors; Brisk acceleration up to 503 hp in dual-motor form; Engaging open-t... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Heavier curb weight compared to traditional ICE roadsters; Limited cabin storage space; Brand availability varies heavil... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
