Mazda CX-30 vs Toyota RAV4
Mazda CX-30
$24,500 – $25,000
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Mazda CX-30 vs Toyota RAV4. Mazda CX-30 offers the strongest value on price. Toyota RAV4 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota RAV4
Best Value
Mazda CX-30
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Toyota RAV4
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Mazda CX-30
$24,500 – $25,000
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Mazda CX-30 |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | CX-30 | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | Subcompact Crossover SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $24,500 – $25,000 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $25,000 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $24,000 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 2.5L Skyactiv-G 4-Cylinder (Naturally Aspirated or Turbo) | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 191 hp (Naturally Aspirated) / 250 hp (Turbo) | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 186 lb-ft (Naturally Aspirated) / 320 lb-ft (Turbo) | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | approx. 7.6 sec (0-60 mph for NA) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 120 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 26 mpg city / 33 mpg highway (Naturally Aspirated) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | Low Emission Vehicle | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 12V standard automotive | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | N/A | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | 9.2 | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.4 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Upscale, near-luxury interior material quality; Engaging, athletic handling and steering feel; Standard i-Activ all-whee... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Tight rear seat legroom compared to some rivals; Noticeable plastic body cladding around wheel arches; Infotainment rota... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
