Mazda CX-30 vs Toyota Corolla
Mazda CX-30
$24,500 – $25,000
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Mazda CX-30 vs Toyota Corolla. Mazda CX-30 offers the strongest value on price. Mazda CX-30 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Mazda CX-30
Best Value
Mazda CX-30
Fuel Economy
Toyota Corolla
Performance
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Corolla
4.6/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Mazda CX-30
$24,500 – $25,000
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
Rating: 4.6/10
| Specification |
Mazda CX-30 |
Toyota Corolla |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | CX-30 | Corolla |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | Subcompact Crossover SUV | Compact Sedan |
| Current Price | $24,500 – $25,000 | $28,799 – $29,500 |
| MSRP | $25,000 | $29,500 |
| Dealer Price | $24,000 | $28,299 |
| Engine | 2.5L Skyactiv-G 4-Cylinder (Naturally Aspirated or Turbo) | 2.0L Dynamic Force Inline-4 |
| Horsepower | 191 hp (Naturally Aspirated) / 250 hp (Turbo) | 169 hp |
| Torque | 186 lb-ft (Naturally Aspirated) / 320 lb-ft (Turbo) | 151 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | approx. 7.6 sec (0-60 mph for NA) | Approx. 8.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 120 mph | Approx. 118 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 26 mpg city / 33 mpg highway (Naturally Aspirated) | 35 MPG combined |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | Low Emission Vehicle | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 12V standard automotive | N/A |
| Charging | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.6/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1680 |
| Performance Score | 8.8 | 8.0 |
| Comfort Score | 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | 9.2 | 9.3 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.4 | 9.2 |
| Technology Score | 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Value Score | 9.0 | 9.1 |
| Pros | Upscale, near-luxury interior material quality; Engaging, athletic handling and steering feel; Standard i-Activ all-whee... | Excellent reliability reputation; Strong fuel economy; Comprehensive standard safety features; Affordable ownership and... |
| Cons | Tight rear seat legroom compared to some rivals; Noticeable plastic body cladding around wheel arches; Infotainment rota... | Rear-seat space is moderate for tall adults; Performance is adequate but not sporty; Some premium tech requires higher t... |
