Jeep Compass vs Toyota RAV4
Jeep Compass
$34,060
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Jeep Compass vs Toyota RAV4. Jeep Compass offers the strongest value on price. Toyota RAV4 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota RAV4
Best Value
Jeep Compass
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Toyota RAV4
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Jeep Compass
$34,060
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Jeep Compass |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Jeep | Toyota |
| Model | Compass | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | Crossover SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $34,060 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $34,060 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $33,100 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 2.0L Turbocharged DOHC 16-Valve Inline 4-Cylinder with Stop/Start | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 200 hp @ 5,000 rpm | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 221 lb-ft @ 1,750 rpm | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 8.4 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 115 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Regular Unleaded Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 26 MPG Combined (23 City / 31 Hwy) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle (SULEV30) | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 12V maintenance-free battery | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | N/A | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 820 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | Top Safety Pick | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.6 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Responsive 200 hp / 221 lb-ft 2.0L Turbocharged engine; Jeep Active Drive Low 4x4 with 20:1 crawl ratio and Rock Mode; S... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Cargo volume behind 2nd row (27.2 cu ft) is smaller than some compact competitors; Ride quality on pavement is slightly... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
