Jeep Avenger vs Jeep Avenger vs Toyota Corolla
Jeep Avenger
€39,995
Jeep Avenger
$30,999 – $31,500
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Jeep Avenger vs Jeep Avenger vs Toyota Corolla. Toyota Corolla offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Corolla leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Corolla
Best Value
Toyota Corolla
Fuel Economy
Toyota Corolla
Performance
Toyota Corolla
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Jeep Avenger
€39,995
Rating: 4.6/10
Jeep Avenger
$30,999 – $31,500
Rating: 4.5/10
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
Rating: 4.6/10
| Specification |
Jeep Avenger |
Jeep Avenger |
Toyota Corolla |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Jeep | Jeep | Toyota |
| Model | Avenger | Avenger | Corolla |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Subcompact Crossover SUV | Compact Sedan |
| Current Price | €39,995 | $30,999 – $31,500 | $28,799 – $29,500 |
| MSRP | €39,995 | $31,500 | $29,500 |
| Dealer Price | €38,999 | $29,999 | $28,299 |
| Engine | 1.2-litre turbo petrol with dual electric motors | 1.2L Turbo I3 + Dual Electric Motors | 2.0L Dynamic Force Inline-4 |
| Horsepower | 136 hp | 145 hp (107 kW) | 169 hp |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 230 Nm (Thermal) / 1,900 Nm (Rear axle transmission ratio) | 151 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 9.5 sec (0-100 km/h) | 9.5 sec (0-100 km/h) | Approx. 8.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 194 km/h | 120 mph (194 km/h) | Approx. 118 mph |
| Fuel Type | Hybrid Petrol | Hybrid Petrol | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 5.3 - 5.4 l/100 km | 5.3 - 5.4 L/100 km (WLTP) | 35 MPG combined |
| Range (EV) | Short urban electric driving capability | Urban low-speed electric driving capability | N/A |
| Emissions | 122-123 g/km CO2 | 122 - 124 g/km CO2 | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 48V Lithium-ion | 48V Lithium-ion system | N/A |
| Charging | Self-charging hybrid system | Self-charging hybrid | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.5/10 | 4.6/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 0 | 1680 |
| Performance Score | 8.6 | 8.4 | 8.0 |
| Comfort Score | 8.4 | 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | 8.8 | 9.0 | 9.3 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.0 | 9.1 | 9.2 |
| Technology Score | 8.7 | 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Value Score | 8.5 | 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Pros | True intelligent hybrid all-wheel drive; Enhanced ground clearance and water fording; Distinctive rugged styling and wat... | Electric all-wheel-drive system (e-AWD); 48V mild hybrid efficiency; Enhanced ground clearance and water fording; Selec-... | Excellent reliability reputation; Strong fuel economy; Comprehensive standard safety features; Affordable ownership and... |
| Cons | Smaller boot space compared to front-wheel-drive versions; Cabin features hard plastics; Ride can be firm on rough terra... | Limited rear passenger space for taller adults; Firm ride over harsh rough terrain; Moderate cargo payload capacity comp... | Rear-seat space is moderate for tall adults; Performance is adequate but not sporty; Some premium tech requires higher t... |
