Jeep Avenger vs Jeep Avenger vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Jeep Avenger
€39,995
Jeep Avenger
$30,999 – $31,500
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Jeep Avenger vs Jeep Avenger vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. Jeep Avenger offers the strongest value on price. Honda CR-V leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Honda CR-V
Best Value
Jeep Avenger
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Jeep Avenger
€39,995
Rating: 4.6/10
Jeep Avenger
$30,999 – $31,500
Rating: 4.5/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
Jeep Avenger |
Jeep Avenger |
Honda CR-V |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Jeep | Jeep | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | Avenger | Avenger | CR-V | Silverado 1500 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — | Suv | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Subcompact Crossover SUV | Compact Crossover SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | €39,995 | $30,999 – $31,500 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $53,599 – $54,800 |
| MSRP | €39,995 | $31,500 | $38,650 | $54,800 |
| Dealer Price | €38,999 | $29,999 | $37,299 | $52,499 |
| Engine | 1.2-litre turbo petrol with dual electric motors | 1.2L Turbo I3 + Dual Electric Motors | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 |
| Horsepower | 136 hp | 145 hp (107 kW) | 190 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 230 Nm (Thermal) / 1,900 Nm (Rear axle transmission ratio) | 179 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 9.5 sec (0-100 km/h) | 9.5 sec (0-100 km/h) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 194 km/h | 120 mph (194 km/h) | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Hybrid Petrol | Hybrid Petrol | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 5.3 - 5.4 l/100 km | 5.3 - 5.4 L/100 km (WLTP) | 29 MPG combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) |
| Range (EV) | Short urban electric driving capability | Urban low-speed electric driving capability | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | 122-123 g/km CO2 | 122 - 124 g/km CO2 | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 48V Lithium-ion | 48V Lithium-ion system | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | Self-charging hybrid system | Self-charging hybrid | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.5/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 0 | 1340 | 870 |
| Performance Score | 8.6 | 8.4 | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.4 | 8.5 | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | 8.8 | 9.0 | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.0 | 9.1 | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Technology Score | 8.7 | 8.7 | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Value Score | 8.5 | 8.8 | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Pros | True intelligent hybrid all-wheel drive; Enhanced ground clearance and water fording; Distinctive rugged styling and wat... | Electric all-wheel-drive system (e-AWD); 48V mild hybrid efficiency; Enhanced ground clearance and water fording; Selec-... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... |
| Cons | Smaller boot space compared to front-wheel-drive versions; Cabin features hard plastics; Ride can be firm on rough terra... | Limited rear passenger space for taller adults; Firm ride over harsh rough terrain; Moderate cargo payload capacity comp... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... |
