Hongqi Tiangong 08 vs Hongqi Tiangong 08 vs Toyota RAV4
Hongqi Tiangong 08
$34,500 – $35,000
Hongqi Tiangong 08
$32,730
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Hongqi Tiangong 08 vs Hongqi Tiangong 08 vs Toyota RAV4. Hongqi Tiangong 08 offers the strongest value on price. Hongqi Tiangong 08 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Hongqi Tiangong 08
Best Value
Hongqi Tiangong 08
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Hongqi Tiangong 08
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Hongqi Tiangong 08
$34,500 – $35,000
Rating: 4.8/10
Hongqi Tiangong 08
$32,730
Rating: 4.8/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Hongqi Tiangong 08 |
Hongqi Tiangong 08 |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Hongqi | Hongqi | Toyota |
| Model | Tiangong 08 | Tiangong 08 | RAV4 |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | Ev | — |
| Body Style | Luxury Crossover SUV | SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $34,500 – $35,000 | $32,730 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $35,000 | $32,730 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $33,999 | $31,500 | $35,199 |
| Engine | Dual Motor AWD | Dual-Motor Electric (AWD) / Single-Motor (RWD) | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 619 hp (455 kW) | Up to 619 hp (455 kW total power) | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 756 N·m | 756 Nm | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 3.9 sec (0-100 km/h) | 3.9 sec (0-100 km/h for dual-motor AWD) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 200 km/h | 200 km/h | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 16.9 kWh/100km | 16.9 kWh/100km consumption | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 680 km CLTC | Up to 730 km (CLTC) | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | 0 g/mi | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 111 kWh Ternary Lithium | 111 kWh max capacity | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | 189 kW DC (10-80% in 20 min) | Fast DC charging support | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.8/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 0 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 9.4 | 9.2 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 9.2 | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | 9.3 | 9.5 | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.5 | 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.1 | 9.4 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Powerful 619 hp dual-motor AWD system; Long 680 km CLTC range from 111 kWh battery; Fast DC charging support up to 189 k... | High-performance dual-motor AWD option with 3.9s 0-100 km/h acceleration; Impressive up to 730 km CLTC electric range on... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Large footprint can be tight in compact urban parking; Brand recognition still growing in western markets; Infotainment... | Real-world highway range may vary based on weather conditions; Brand availability heavily focused on select global marke... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
