Haval Xiaolong Max vs Nissan Titan vs Hozon Neta GT
Haval Xiaolong Max
$21,500 – $22,000
Nissan Titan
$53,580
Hozon Neta GT
$31,900
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Haval Xiaolong Max vs Nissan Titan vs Hozon Neta GT. Haval Xiaolong Max offers the strongest value on price. Haval Xiaolong Max leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Haval Xiaolong Max
Best Value
Haval Xiaolong Max
Fuel Economy
Hozon Neta GT
Performance
Hozon Neta GT
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Haval Xiaolong Max
$21,500 – $22,000
Rating: 4.6/10
Nissan Titan
$53,580
Rating: 4.1/10
Hozon Neta GT
$31,900
Rating: 4.3/10
| Specification |
Haval Xiaolong Max |
Nissan Titan |
Hozon Neta GT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Haval | Nissan | Hozon |
| Model | Xiaolong Max | Titan | Neta GT |
| Year | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 |
| Type | — | — | Ev |
| Body Style | SUV | Pickup | Coupe |
| Current Price | $21,500 – $22,000 | $53,580 | $31,900 |
| MSRP | $22,000 | $53,580 | $31,900 |
| Dealer Price | $21,000 | $51,900 | $30,500 |
| Engine | 1.5L Turbo Engine + Dual Electric Motors (Hi4 Hybrid) | 5.6L DOHC 32-Valve Endurance V8 | Dual Motor AWD |
| Horsepower | 279 hp (System Total) | 400 hp @ 5,800 rpm | 462 hp |
| Torque | 585 Nm (System Total) | 413 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm | 620 Nm |
| 0–60 mph | 6.8 sec (0-100 km/h) | 6.4 sec (0-60 mph) | 3.7 sec (0-100 km/h) |
| Top Speed | 190 km/h | 110 mph | 190 km/h |
| Fuel Type | Plug-in Hybrid (Petrol + Electric) | Regular Unleaded Gasoline | Electric |
| Mileage / MPG | 5.5 L/100km (WLTC fuel consumption when depleted) | 16 MPGe combined (14 City / 20 Hwy) | 580 km CLTC |
| Range (EV) | 83 km NEDC pure electric range | 520 miles total highway tank range | 580 km CLTC |
| Emissions | Low emission PHEV | 540 g/mi CO2 | 0 g/km |
| Battery | 19.94 kWh LFP | 12V starter battery | 78 kWh |
| Charging | DC Fast Charging & AC Normal Charging | N/A | DC Fast Charge (~30 min for 30-80%) |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.1/10 | 4.3/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 840 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 8.8 | 8.5 | 9.2 |
| Comfort Score | 8.7 | 9.1 | 7.8 |
| Safety Score | 9.0 | Nissan Safety Shield 360 | 8.5 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.4 | 7.0 | 9.0 |
| Technology Score | 8.9 | 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Value Score | 9.3 | 8.6 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Hi4 intelligent four-wheel drive architecture; Strong combined power output of 279 hp; Generous pure electric range for... | Standard 400 hp 5.6L V8 engine delivers strong performance; Ultra-comfortable NASA-inspired Zero Gravity front seats; Co... | Blistering 3.7s 0-100 km/h acceleration; Attractive entry-level pricing; Impressive 580 km CLTC range; Striking aerodyna... |
| Cons | Brand availability varies by international market; Infotainment system has a slight learning curve; Suspension can feel... | Maximum towing capacity (9,290 lbs) is lower than class-leading full-size rivals; V8 fuel economy is lower than turbocha... | Tight rear seat headroom and legroom; Plastics dominate some interior touchpoints; Brand support and long-term network c... |
