GWM Souo Moto Souo S2000 vs GWM Souo S2000 vs Toyota RAV4
GWM Souo Moto Souo S2000
$30,700
GWM Souo S2000
$32,000
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing GWM Souo Moto Souo S2000 vs GWM Souo S2000 vs Toyota RAV4. GWM Souo Moto Souo S2000 offers the strongest value on price. GWM Souo Moto Souo S2000 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
GWM Souo Moto Souo S2000
Best Value
GWM Souo Moto Souo S2000
Fuel Economy
GWM Souo Moto Souo S2000
Performance
Toyota RAV4
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
GWM Souo Moto Souo S2000
$30,700
Rating: 4.8/10
GWM Souo S2000
$32,000
Rating: 4.8/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
GWM Souo Moto Souo S2000 |
GWM Souo S2000 |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | GWM Souo Moto | GWM Souo | Toyota |
| Model | Souo S2000 | S2000 | RAV4 |
| Year | 2025 | 2024 | 2026 |
| Type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle | — |
| Body Style | Touring | Touring | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $30,700 | $32,000 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $30,700 | $32,000 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $29,900 | $31,000 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 1,999 cc boxer-eight | 1,999 cc liquid-cooled boxer-eight | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 151.5 hp | 151.5 hp | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 140 lb-ft (190 N·m) | 140 lb-ft (190 N⋅m) | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 3.7 sec (0-60 mph) | Undisclosed | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 130 mph (210 km/h) | 130 mph (210 km/h) | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Petrol (95 RON) | Gasoline (95 RON) | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 5.9 L/100 km (approx 40 mpg US) | 40 mpg US (5.9 L/100 km) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | Euro 5 equivalent compliant | Standard | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | N/A | N/A | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | N/A | N/A | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.8/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 45 | 45 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 9.5 | 9.2 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 9.6 | 9.5 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | Blind-spot monitoring, rear-collision warning, rear cross traffic alert | 9.0 | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.5 | 8.5 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.2 | 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.8 | 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Incredible 1,999cc flat-eight engine smoothness; Smooth 8-speed dual-clutch transmission with reverse; Advanced Snapdrag... | Unique and smooth 2.0L flat-eight engine; Advanced 8-speed dual-wet clutch transmission; Luxurious comfort features and... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Heavy wet weight requires getting used to at low speeds; Limited global dealer and service network compared to legacy br... | Very heavy wet weight; Limited dealer network globally compared to legacy brands; Substantial physical dimensions can ta... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
