Geely Galaxy E5 vs Geely Galaxy E5 vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Geely Galaxy E5
$17,440
Geely Galaxy E5
$19,500 – $20,000
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Geely Galaxy E5 vs Geely Galaxy E5 vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. Geely Galaxy E5 offers the strongest value on price. Honda CR-V leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Honda CR-V
Best Value
Geely Galaxy E5
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Geely Galaxy E5
$17,440
Rating: 4.6/10
Geely Galaxy E5
$19,500 – $20,000
Rating: 4.6/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
Geely Galaxy E5 |
Geely Galaxy E5 |
Honda CR-V |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Geely | Geely | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | Galaxy E5 | Galaxy E5 | CR-V | Silverado 1500 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | Ev | Suv | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Compact SUV | Compact Crossover SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | $17,440 | $19,500 – $20,000 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $53,599 – $54,800 |
| MSRP | $17,440 | $20,000 | $38,650 | $54,800 |
| Dealer Price | $16,999 | $19,000 | $37,299 | $52,499 |
| Engine | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Electric Motor | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 |
| Horsepower | 218 hp | 215 hp | 190 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 320 Nm | 179 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 6.9 sec (0-100 km/h) | 6.9 sec (0-100 km/h) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 180 km/h | 175 km/h | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 12.1 kWh/100km efficiency | Approx. 440 km to 530 km CLTC range depending on battery pack | 29 MPG combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) |
| Range (EV) | 530 km CLTC | Up to 530 km (CLTC) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | 0 g/mi | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 60.22 kWh | 49.52 kWh or 60.22 kWh LFP | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | 160 kW DC (30-80% in 20 min) | DC Fast Charging compatible | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 145 | 0 | 1340 | 870 |
| Performance Score | 8.4 | 8.4 | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.9 | 8.9 | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | Aegis short-blade LFP safety technology | 9.1 | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.2 | 9.3 | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Technology Score | 8.9 | Aegis Short Blade LFP Battery | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Value Score | 9.5 | 9.4 | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Pros | Competitive pricing and high value; Impressive 530 km CLTC range; Fast DC charging support up to 160 kW; Spacious 5-seat... | Advanced Aegis short blade LFP battery safety; Spacious interior layout with a flat floor; High-tech Flyme Auto infotain... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... |
| Cons | Front-wheel drive only option currently; Limited global dealer network availability; Infotainment learning curve for new... | Front-wheel drive only configuration; Brand availability varies outside primary launch markets; Physical buttons are spa... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... |
