Ford Ranger vs Lexus LBX vs Toyota Camry
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Lexus LBX
$48,000
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Ford Ranger vs Lexus LBX vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Lexus LBX leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Lexus LBX
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Lexus LBX
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Lexus LBX
$48,000
Rating: 4.8/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Ford Ranger |
Lexus LBX |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ford | Lexus | Toyota |
| Model | Ranger | LBX | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | — | — | — |
| Body Style | Pickup Truck | Compact SUV | Sedan |
| Current Price | $42,500 – $43,200 | $48,000 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | $43,200 | $48,000 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | $41,900 | $47,000 | $35,995 |
| Engine | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 1.6L Turbocharged Inline-3 | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 270 hp | 300 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 310 lb-ft | 295 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 5.2 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 112 mph | 155 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 22 mpg combined | 24 MPG combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | — | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | EPA compliant | Varies by region | Low |
| Battery | — | N/A | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | — | N/A | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 1120 | 45 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 8.5 | 9.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 9.0 | 8.2 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 9.2 | Lexus Safety System + | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.5 | 7.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 8.8 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.0 | 8.6 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Thrilling 300-hp turbo engine performance; Advanced GR-Four inspired AWD system; Distinctive aggressive body styling; Dr... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | Firm ride quality due to sport tuning; Limited rear cargo room compared to larger SUVs; Higher fuel consumption than sta... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
