Ford Explorer vs Toyota RAV4
Ford Explorer
$49,430
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Ford Explorer vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Ford Explorer leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Ford Explorer
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Ford Explorer
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Ford Explorer
$49,430
Rating: 4.7/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Ford Explorer |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Explorer | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $49,430 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $49,430 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $48,100 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 2.3L EcoBoost Turbocharged Inline 4-Cylinder | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 300 hp @ 5,500 rpm | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 310 lb-ft @ 3,500 rpm | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 115 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Regular Unleaded Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 20 MPG Combined (19 City / 22 Hwy) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle (SULEV30) | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 12V maintenance-free battery | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | N/A | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.7/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 890 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | Top Safety Pick+ | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.1 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Standard Torsen mechanical limited-slip rear differential for superior trail traction; Responsive 300 hp / 310 lb-ft 2.3... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Fuel economy drops to 20 MPG combined on all-terrain tires; 3rd-row seating legroom is tighter than in larger full-size... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
