Ford Expedition MAX vs Toyota Corolla
Ford Expedition MAX
$77,250
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Ford Expedition MAX vs Toyota Corolla. Toyota Corolla offers the strongest value on price. Ford Expedition MAX leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Ford Expedition MAX
Best Value
Toyota Corolla
Fuel Economy
Toyota Corolla
Performance
Ford Expedition MAX
Toyota Corolla
4.6/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Ford Expedition MAX
$77,250
Rating: 4.8/10
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
Rating: 4.6/10
| Specification |
Ford Expedition MAX |
Toyota Corolla |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Expedition MAX | Corolla |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Compact Sedan |
| Current Price | $77,250 | $28,799 – $29,500 |
| MSRP | $77,250 | $29,500 |
| Dealer Price | $75,600 | $28,299 |
| Engine | 3.5L EcoBoost Twin-Turbocharged V6 | 2.0L Dynamic Force Inline-4 |
| Horsepower | 400 hp @ 5,200 rpm | 169 hp |
| Torque | 480 lb-ft @ 3,300 rpm | 151 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 5.9 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 8.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 115 mph | Approx. 118 mph |
| Fuel Type | Regular Unleaded Gasoline (Premium recommended for HO version) | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 18 MPG Combined (15 City / 22 Hwy) | 35 MPG combined |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle (SULEV30) | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 12V maintenance-free battery | N/A |
| Charging | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.6/10 |
| Community Reviews | 1120 | 1680 |
| Performance Score | 8.8 | 8.0 |
| Comfort Score | 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | Top Safety Pick | 9.3 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 7.3 | 9.2 |
| Technology Score | 9.8 | 8.5 |
| Value Score | 9.0 | 9.1 |
| Pros | Immense 37.4 cu ft cargo capacity behind the 3rd row (11.8 inches longer than standard Expedition); Futuristic 24-inch p... | Excellent reliability reputation; Strong fuel economy; Comprehensive standard safety features; Affordable ownership and... |
| Cons | Substantial 221.7-inch total length requires extra garage depth; 18 MPG combined fuel economy trails smaller unibody cro... | Rear-seat space is moderate for tall adults; Performance is adequate but not sporty; Some premium tech requires higher t... |
