Ford Bronco Sport vs Toyota RAV4
Ford Bronco Sport
$38,265
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Ford Bronco Sport vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Toyota RAV4 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota RAV4
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Ford Bronco Sport
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Ford Bronco Sport
$38,265
Rating: 4.5/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Ford Bronco Sport |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Bronco Sport | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $38,265 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $38,265 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $36,900 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 2.0L EcoBoost Turbocharged 4-Cylinder | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 250 hp @ 5,500 rpm | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 280 lb-ft @ 3,000 rpm | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 5.9 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 118 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Regular / Premium Unleaded Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 23 MPGe combined (21 City / 27 Hwy) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 380 miles total highway tank range | N/A |
| Emissions | 380 g/mi CO2 | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 12V starter battery | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | N/A | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 940 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | Ford Co-Pilot360 Assist+ | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Standard 4x4 drivetrain across every trim level; Punchy 250 hp 2.0L EcoBoost engine with twin-clutch rear differential o... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Rear seat legroom is somewhat cozy for tall adult passengers; 1.5L 3-cylinder base engine works harder under full highwa... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
