Dongfeng eπ 008 vs Nissan Titan vs Hozon Neta GT
Dongfeng eπ 008
$27,500 – $28,000
Nissan Titan
$53,580
Hozon Neta GT
$31,900
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Dongfeng eπ 008 vs Nissan Titan vs Hozon Neta GT. Dongfeng eπ 008 offers the strongest value on price. Dongfeng eπ 008 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Dongfeng eπ 008
Best Value
Dongfeng eπ 008
Fuel Economy
Hozon Neta GT
Performance
Hozon Neta GT
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Dongfeng eπ 008
$27,500 – $28,000
Rating: 4.5/10
Nissan Titan
$53,580
Rating: 4.1/10
Hozon Neta GT
$31,900
Rating: 4.3/10
| Specification |
Dongfeng eπ 008 |
Nissan Titan |
Hozon Neta GT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Dongfeng | Nissan | Hozon |
| Model | eπ 008 | Titan | Neta GT |
| Year | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 |
| Type | Ev | — | Ev |
| Body Style | SUV | Pickup | Coupe |
| Current Price | $27,500 – $28,000 | $53,580 | $31,900 |
| MSRP | $28,000 | $53,580 | $31,900 |
| Dealer Price | $26,500 | $51,900 | $30,500 |
| Engine | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor / 1.5L Range Extender (EREV) | 5.6L DOHC 32-Valve Endurance V8 | Dual Motor AWD |
| Horsepower | 268 hp (BEV) / 215 hp electric motor with 1.5L ICE generator (EREV) | 400 hp @ 5,800 rpm | 462 hp |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 413 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm | 620 Nm |
| 0–60 mph | Under 7 seconds (0-100 km/h) | 6.4 sec (0-60 mph) | 3.7 sec (0-100 km/h) |
| Top Speed | 180 km/h | 110 mph | 190 km/h |
| Fuel Type | Electric / Range Extender Hybrid | Regular Unleaded Gasoline | Electric |
| Mileage / MPG | N/A | 16 MPGe combined (14 City / 20 Hwy) | 580 km CLTC |
| Range (EV) | 636 km CLTC (BEV) / 210 km pure electric (EREV) | 520 miles total highway tank range | 580 km CLTC |
| Emissions | 0 g/km (BEV) / Low emission (EREV) | 540 g/mi CO2 | 0 g/km |
| Battery | 82.83 kWh (BEV) / 34.32 kWh (EREV) | 12V starter battery | 78 kWh |
| Charging | DC Fast Charging support | N/A | DC Fast Charge (~30 min for 30-80%) |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.1/10 | 4.3/10 |
| Community Reviews | 45 | 840 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 8.2 | 8.5 | 9.2 |
| Comfort Score | 9.1 | 9.1 | 7.8 |
| Safety Score | 8.8 | Nissan Safety Shield 360 | 8.5 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 |
| Technology Score | 8.9 | 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Value Score | 9.5 | 8.6 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Massive 3,025 mm wheelbase providing generous cabin space; Available in both BEV and EREV dual-powertrain options; Luxur... | Standard 400 hp 5.6L V8 engine delivers strong performance; Ultra-comfortable NASA-inspired Zero Gravity front seats; Co... | Blistering 3.7s 0-100 km/h acceleration; Attractive entry-level pricing; Impressive 580 km CLTC range; Striking aerodyna... |
| Cons | Large vehicle dimensions can make tight parking tricky; Brand recognition still growing in global markets; Third-row spa... | Maximum towing capacity (9,290 lbs) is lower than class-leading full-size rivals; V8 fuel economy is lower than turbocha... | Tight rear seat headroom and legroom; Plastics dominate some interior touchpoints; Brand support and long-term network c... |
