Denza Z9 GT vs Denza Z9 GT vs Toyota RAV4
Denza Z9 GT
$49,970
Denza Z9 GT
$85,000
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Denza Z9 GT vs Denza Z9 GT vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Denza Z9 GT leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Denza Z9 GT
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Toyota RAV4
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Denza Z9 GT
$49,970
Rating: 4.8/10
Denza Z9 GT
$85,000
Rating: 4.8/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Denza Z9 GT |
Denza Z9 GT |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Denza | Denza | Toyota |
| Model | Z9 GT | Z9 GT | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2025 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | Ev | — |
| Body Style | Shooting Brake | Luxury Grand Tourer Hatchback / Wagon | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $49,970 | $85,000 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $49,970 | $85,000 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $48,500 | $83,000 | $35,199 |
| Engine | Tri-Motor Permanent Magnet Synchronous AWD | Tri-Motor Electric AWD System (1 front, 2 rear) | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 952 hp (710 kW) | approx. 952 hp (710 kW) | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 1150 Nm | High-output torque vectoring | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 2.7 - 3.4 sec (0-100 km/h) | Under 3.5 seconds (0-100 km/h / 0-62 mph) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 240 km/h | 240 km/h (149 mph) | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 18.3 kWh/100km efficiency | N/A - Fully Electric | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 630 km - 820 km CLTC | Over 600+ km (CLTC standard) | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/mi | 0 g/mi | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 100 kWh | High-capacity Blade Battery pack | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | Ultra-fast FLASH charging (9 min full charge capability) | High-power DC Fast Charge capable | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.8/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 0 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 9.8 | 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 9.5 | 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | High-Speed Blowout Stability & Low-Adhesion Stabilization | Comprehensive active collision avoidance and stability control | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.2 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.7 | 9.5 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.3 | 9.1 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Explosive tri-motor acceleration (0-100 km/h in 2.7 - 3.4 seconds); Next-generation Blade Battery 2.0 with ultra-fast ch... | Staggering tri-motor powertrain output (~952 horsepower); Independent rear-wheel steering and crab-walk capabilities; Lu... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Large footprint can feel wide in tight urban parking; High curb weight typical of high-capacity tri-motor EVs; Limited g... | Large footprint can feel wide in compact urban settings; High-performance configurations carry premium positioning | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
