Denza Z9 GT vs Denza Z9 GT vs Toyota Corolla
Denza Z9 GT
$49,970
Denza Z9 GT
$85,000
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Denza Z9 GT vs Denza Z9 GT vs Toyota Corolla. Toyota Corolla offers the strongest value on price. Denza Z9 GT leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Denza Z9 GT
Best Value
Toyota Corolla
Fuel Economy
Toyota Corolla
Performance
Toyota Corolla
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Denza Z9 GT
$49,970
Rating: 4.8/10
Denza Z9 GT
$85,000
Rating: 4.8/10
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
Rating: 4.6/10
| Specification |
Denza Z9 GT |
Denza Z9 GT |
Toyota Corolla |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Denza | Denza | Toyota |
| Model | Z9 GT | Z9 GT | Corolla |
| Year | 2026 | 2025 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | Ev | — |
| Body Style | Shooting Brake | Luxury Grand Tourer Hatchback / Wagon | Compact Sedan |
| Current Price | $49,970 | $85,000 | $28,799 – $29,500 |
| MSRP | $49,970 | $85,000 | $29,500 |
| Dealer Price | $48,500 | $83,000 | $28,299 |
| Engine | Tri-Motor Permanent Magnet Synchronous AWD | Tri-Motor Electric AWD System (1 front, 2 rear) | 2.0L Dynamic Force Inline-4 |
| Horsepower | 952 hp (710 kW) | approx. 952 hp (710 kW) | 169 hp |
| Torque | 1150 Nm | High-output torque vectoring | 151 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 2.7 - 3.4 sec (0-100 km/h) | Under 3.5 seconds (0-100 km/h / 0-62 mph) | Approx. 8.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 240 km/h | 240 km/h (149 mph) | Approx. 118 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 18.3 kWh/100km efficiency | N/A - Fully Electric | 35 MPG combined |
| Range (EV) | 630 km - 820 km CLTC | Over 600+ km (CLTC standard) | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/mi | 0 g/mi | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 100 kWh | High-capacity Blade Battery pack | N/A |
| Charging | Ultra-fast FLASH charging (9 min full charge capability) | High-power DC Fast Charge capable | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.8/10 | 4.6/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 0 | 1680 |
| Performance Score | 9.8 | 9.6 | 8.0 |
| Comfort Score | 9.5 | 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | High-Speed Blowout Stability & Low-Adhesion Stabilization | Comprehensive active collision avoidance and stability control | 9.3 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.2 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Technology Score | 9.7 | 9.5 | 8.5 |
| Value Score | 9.3 | 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Pros | Explosive tri-motor acceleration (0-100 km/h in 2.7 - 3.4 seconds); Next-generation Blade Battery 2.0 with ultra-fast ch... | Staggering tri-motor powertrain output (~952 horsepower); Independent rear-wheel steering and crab-walk capabilities; Lu... | Excellent reliability reputation; Strong fuel economy; Comprehensive standard safety features; Affordable ownership and... |
| Cons | Large footprint can feel wide in tight urban parking; High curb weight typical of high-capacity tri-motor EVs; Limited g... | Large footprint can feel wide in compact urban settings; High-performance configurations carry premium positioning | Rear-seat space is moderate for tall adults; Performance is adequate but not sporty; Some premium tech requires higher t... |
