Chevrolet Trailblazer vs Toyota Corolla
Chevrolet Trailblazer
$29,995
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Chevrolet Trailblazer vs Toyota Corolla. Toyota Corolla offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Corolla leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Corolla
Best Value
Toyota Corolla
Fuel Economy
Toyota Corolla
Performance
Toyota Corolla
Toyota Corolla
4.6/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Chevrolet Trailblazer
$29,995
Rating: 4.4/10
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
Rating: 4.6/10
| Specification |
Chevrolet Trailblazer |
Toyota Corolla |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Trailblazer | Corolla |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | Crossover | Compact Sedan |
| Current Price | $29,995 | $28,799 – $29,500 |
| MSRP | $29,995 | $29,500 |
| Dealer Price | $28,900 | $28,299 |
| Engine | 1.3L ECOTEC Turbocharged 3-Cylinder | 2.0L Dynamic Force Inline-4 |
| Horsepower | 155 hp @ 5,600 rpm | 169 hp |
| Torque | 174 lb-ft @ 1,600 rpm | 151 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 8.3 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 8.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 115 mph | Approx. 118 mph |
| Fuel Type | Regular Unleaded Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 27 MPGe combined (26 City / 29 Hwy) | 35 MPG combined |
| Range (EV) | 380 miles total highway tank range | N/A |
| Emissions | 320 g/mi CO2 | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 12V starter battery | N/A |
| Charging | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.4/10 | 4.6/10 |
| Community Reviews | 890 | 1680 |
| Performance Score | 7.8 | 8.0 |
| Comfort Score | 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | Chevy Safety Assist | 9.3 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.5 | 9.2 |
| Technology Score | 9.3 | 8.5 |
| Value Score | 9.0 | 9.1 |
| Pros | Standard 11-inch touchscreen display with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto across all trims; Unique fold-flat fro... | Excellent reliability reputation; Strong fuel economy; Comprehensive standard safety features; Affordable ownership and... |
| Cons | Base 1.2L engine in FWD trims is adequate rather than quick; AWD fuel economy is slightly lower than some less rugged su... | Rear-seat space is moderate for tall adults; Performance is adequate but not sporty; Some premium tech requires higher t... |