GAC Aion Aion V vs Nissan Titan vs Hozon Neta GT
GAC Aion Aion V
$24,000 – $25,000
Nissan Titan
$53,580
Hozon Neta GT
$31,900
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing GAC Aion Aion V vs Nissan Titan vs Hozon Neta GT. GAC Aion Aion V offers the strongest value on price. GAC Aion Aion V leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
GAC Aion Aion V
Best Value
GAC Aion Aion V
Fuel Economy
Hozon Neta GT
Performance
Hozon Neta GT
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
GAC Aion Aion V
$24,000 – $25,000
Rating: 4.5/10
Nissan Titan
$53,580
Rating: 4.1/10
Hozon Neta GT
$31,900
Rating: 4.3/10
| Specification |
GAC Aion Aion V |
Nissan Titan |
Hozon Neta GT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | GAC Aion | Nissan | Hozon |
| Model | Aion V | Titan | Neta GT |
| Year | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 |
| Type | Ev | — | Ev |
| Body Style | SUV | Pickup | Coupe |
| Current Price | $24,000 – $25,000 | $53,580 | $31,900 |
| MSRP | $25,000 | $53,580 | $31,900 |
| Dealer Price | $23,500 | $51,900 | $30,500 |
| Engine | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor | 5.6L DOHC 32-Valve Endurance V8 | Dual Motor AWD |
| Horsepower | 221 hp | 400 hp @ 5,800 rpm | 462 hp |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 413 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm | 620 Nm |
| 0–60 mph | 7.6 sec (0-100 km/h) | 6.4 sec (0-60 mph) | 3.7 sec (0-100 km/h) |
| Top Speed | 160 km/h | 110 mph | 190 km/h |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Regular Unleaded Gasoline | Electric |
| Mileage / MPG | N/A | 16 MPGe combined (14 City / 20 Hwy) | 580 km CLTC |
| Range (EV) | 600 km (NEDC) | 520 miles total highway tank range | 580 km CLTC |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | 540 g/mi CO2 | 0 g/km |
| Battery | 80 kWh | 12V starter battery | 78 kWh |
| Charging | DC Fast Charging | N/A | DC Fast Charge (~30 min for 30-80%) |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.1/10 | 4.3/10 |
| Community Reviews | 45 | 840 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 8.2 | 8.5 | 9.2 |
| Comfort Score | 8.8 | 9.1 | 7.8 |
| Safety Score | ADMS driving assistance | Nissan Safety Shield 360 | 8.5 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 |
| Technology Score | 9.0 | 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Value Score | 9.2 | 8.6 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Spacious interior and long wheelbase; Impressive electric driving range; Advanced smart cockpit features; Competitive pr... | Standard 400 hp 5.6L V8 engine delivers strong performance; Ultra-comfortable NASA-inspired Zero Gravity front seats; Co... | Blistering 3.7s 0-100 km/h acceleration; Attractive entry-level pricing; Impressive 580 km CLTC range; Striking aerodyna... |
| Cons | Brand recognition still growing globally; Limited physical button controls | Maximum towing capacity (9,290 lbs) is lower than class-leading full-size rivals; V8 fuel economy is lower than turbocha... | Tight rear seat headroom and legroom; Plastics dominate some interior touchpoints; Brand support and long-term network c... |
