GAC Aion Aion V Plus vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
GAC Aion Aion V Plus
$33,999 – $35,000
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing GAC Aion Aion V Plus vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. GAC Aion Aion V Plus offers the strongest value on price. Honda CR-V leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Honda CR-V
Best Value
GAC Aion Aion V Plus
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
GAC Aion Aion V Plus
$33,999 – $35,000
Rating: 4.5/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
GAC Aion Aion V Plus |
Honda CR-V |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | GAC Aion | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | Aion V Plus | CR-V | Silverado 1500 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | Suv | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Compact Crossover SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | $33,999 – $35,000 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $53,599 – $54,800 |
| MSRP | $35,000 | $38,650 | $54,800 |
| Dealer Price | $32,999 | $37,299 | $52,499 |
| Engine | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 |
| Horsepower | 204 hp | 190 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 179 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 7.9 sec (0-100 km/h) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 99 mph (160 km/h) | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 16.7 kWh / 62 miles (WLTP) | 29 MPG combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) |
| Range (EV) | 317 miles WLTP | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 75.3 kWh | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | 180 kW DC (30-80% in 18 min) | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1340 | 870 |
| Performance Score | 8.0 | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.8 | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | Magazine Battery 2.0 | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.2 | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Technology Score | 9.0 | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Value Score | 9.1 | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Pros | Advanced Magazine Battery 2.0 safety tech; Spacious 2,775 mm wheelbase interior; Fast DC charging support; Comprehensive... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... |
| Cons | Rear torsion beam suspension on select setups; Limited brand availability outside major markets; Infotainment learning c... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... |
