Volvo XC60 vs Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
$63,935
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Volvo XC60 vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Volvo XC60 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Volvo XC60
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Volvo XC60
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Volvo XC60
$63,935
Rating: 8.6/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Volvo XC60 |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Volvo | Toyota |
| Model | XC60 | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Suv | — |
| Body Style | 5-door premium crossover | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $63,935 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $63,935 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $61,800 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 2.0L Turbocharged 4-Cylinder with Integrated 48V Starter-Generator | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 247 | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 258 lb-ft | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 6.5s 0-60 mph | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 112 mph (180 km/h) | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Premium Unleaded | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | — | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 0 miles | N/A |
| Emissions | 164 g/km | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 48V Lithium-Ion Recuperation Storage Battery | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | Braking energy energy regeneration storage capture | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 8.6/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 8.0 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | 9.5 | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | — | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | — | 9.2 |
| Pros | New 11.2-inch infotainment workspace displays sharper graphics and responds quickly to touch commands; Exemplary cabin m... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | B5 powertrain focuses heavily on cruising efficiency rather than aggressive performance dynamics; Maximum physical cargo... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
