Toyota Highlander vs Toyota Highlander vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Toyota Highlander
$46,270
Toyota Highlander
$45,570 – $47,465
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Toyota Highlander vs Toyota Highlander vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. Honda CR-V offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Highlander leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Highlander
Best Value
Honda CR-V
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Toyota Highlander
$46,270
Rating: 8.2/10
Toyota Highlander
$45,570 – $47,465
Rating: 8.4/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
Toyota Highlander |
Toyota Highlander |
Honda CR-V |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Toyota | Toyota | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | Highlander | Highlander | CR-V | Silverado 1500 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Suv | Suv | Suv | — |
| Body Style | 4-door mid-size suv | 4-door mid-size SUV | Compact Crossover SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | $46,270 | $45,570 – $47,465 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $53,599 – $54,800 |
| MSRP | $46,270 | $47,465 | $38,650 | $54,800 |
| Dealer Price | $45,100 | — | $37,299 | $52,499 |
| Engine | 2.4L Turbocharged 4-Cylinder | 2.4L Turbocharged Inline-4 | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 |
| Horsepower | 265 | 265 | 190 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque | 310 lb-ft | 310 lb-ft | 179 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 7.4s 0-60 mph estimate | N/A | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 113 mph | N/A | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Regular Unleaded | Gasoline | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | — | 21 city / 28 hwy / 24 combined MPG | 29 MPG combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) |
| Range (EV) | 0 miles | — | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | Not rated | N/A | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | Conventional 12V | — | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | Not Applicable | — | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 8.2/10 | 8.4/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 0 | 1340 | 870 |
| Performance Score | 7.5 | 7.0 | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.5 | 8.0 | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | — | 9.0 | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Fuel Economy Score | — | — | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Technology Score | 8.0 | — | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Value Score | — | — | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Pros | Standard all-wheel drive across all trim levels; Quiet and well-organized cabin layout; Standard Toyota Safety Sense 2.5 | Standard AWD across all trims; Efficient hybrid option (up to 35 mpg combined); Strong safety suite standard; Flexible 7... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... |
| Cons | Driving dynamics prioritize comfort over excitement; Third row is relatively tight compared to larger competitors | Base LE trim discontinued, raising entry price; Turbo gas engine feels underpowered for the segment; Interior tech is ba... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... |
