Hyundai Santa Fe vs Toyota RAV4
Hyundai Santa Fe
$42,040
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Hyundai Santa Fe vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Hyundai Santa Fe leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Hyundai Santa Fe
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Hyundai Santa Fe
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Hyundai Santa Fe
$42,040
Rating: 8.5/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Hyundai Santa Fe |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Hyundai | Toyota |
| Model | Santa Fe | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Suv | — |
| Body Style | 5-door mid-size suv | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $42,040 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $42,040 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $40,500 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 2.5L 4-Cylinder Inline Turbocharged Gas Direct Injection (GDI) | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 277 | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 311 lb-ft @ 4000 RPM | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 6.9s 0-60 mph estimate | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 130 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Regular Unleaded Permitted (87 Octane) | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | — | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 0 miles | N/A |
| Emissions | ULEV70 Certified | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | Conventional 12V Battery with Intelligent Idle Stop & Go Systems | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | Not Applicable | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 8.5/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | — | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | — | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | — | 9.2 |
| Pros | Upgraded mid-tier cabin layout gains standard dual wireless device docks and helpful third-row passenger USB ports; Chun... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Aggressive all-terrain tread patterns and blocky exterior shell drop EPA-estimated fuel economy down to 21 combined MPG;... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
