Honda Pilot vs Toyota RAV4
Honda Pilot
$50,595
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Honda Pilot vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Honda Pilot leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Honda Pilot
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Honda Pilot
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Honda Pilot
$50,595
Rating: 8.7/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Honda Pilot |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Honda | Toyota |
| Model | Pilot | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Suv | — |
| Body Style | 5-door mid-size 3-row suv | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $50,595 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $50,595 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $48,900 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 3.5L DOHC 24-Valve V6 Engine with Direct Injection | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 285 | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 262 lb-ft @ 5000 RPM | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 6.9s 0-60 mph estimate | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 115 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Regular Unleaded Permitted (87 Octane) | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | — | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 0 miles | N/A |
| Emissions | LEV4-SULEV30 Certified | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | Conventional 12V Battery with Idle-Stop System | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | Not Applicable | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 8.7/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | — | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | — | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | — | 9.2 |
| Pros | i-VTM4 AWD system with Trail Torque Logic and steel skid plates delivers genuine off-pavement trail capability; Upgraded... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Fuel economy (18 City / 23 Highway MPG) is slightly lower than non-trail-oriented 3-row crossover competitors; Naturally... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
