Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Ford Mustang Mach-E
$54,990
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. Honda CR-V offers the strongest value on price. Ford Mustang Mach-E leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Best Value
Honda CR-V
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Ford Mustang Mach-E
$54,990
Rating: 8.7/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
Ford Mustang Mach-E |
Honda CR-V |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ford | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | Mustang Mach-E | CR-V | Silverado 1500 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Suv | Suv | — |
| Body Style | 5-door crossover coupe suv | Compact Crossover SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | $54,990 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $53,599 – $54,800 |
| MSRP | $54,990 | $38,650 | $54,800 |
| Dealer Price | $52,800 | $37,299 | $52,499 |
| Engine | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous AC Electric Motors | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 |
| Horsepower | 480 | 190 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque | 700 lb-ft with Performance Upgrade | 179 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 3.3s 0-60 mph with Performance Upgrade | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 124 mph | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | — | 29 MPG combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) |
| Range (EV) | 280 miles | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 91.0 kWh Usable Lithium-Ion Battery Pack with Enhanced Cold Weather Thermal Chemistry | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | 175 kW DC Fast Charge Peak Capability (10% to 80% in 32 minutes) | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 8.7/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1340 | 870 |
| Performance Score | 9.4 | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.4 | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | — | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Fuel Economy Score | — | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Technology Score | 8.9 | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Value Score | — | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Pros | Explosive, near-instantaneous 700 lb-ft torque delivery translates to sports-car-slaying straight-line sprint times; Upg... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... |
| Cons | Performance suspension calibrations deliver a highly communicative but noticeably firm ride quality over coarse roads; M... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... |
