Dodge Durango vs Toyota RAV4
Dodge Durango
$49,995
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Dodge Durango vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Dodge Durango leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Dodge Durango
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Dodge Durango
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Dodge Durango
$49,995
Rating: 8.5/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Dodge Durango |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Dodge | Toyota |
| Model | Durango | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Suv | — |
| Body Style | 4-door performance mid-size suv | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $49,995 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $49,995 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $48,500 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 6.4L 392 HEMI SRT naturally aspirated V8 | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 475 | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 470 lb-ft @ 4300 RPM | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 4.4s 0-60 mph | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 160 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Premium Unleaded Recommended | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | — | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 0 miles | N/A |
| Emissions | EPA Certified | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | Conventional 12V Maintenance-Free Heavy-Duty Battery | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | Not Applicable | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 8.5/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 9.3 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | — | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | — | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | — | 9.2 |
| Pros | Standard 392 cubic-inch V8 provides incredible, instant power delivery and a distinctive exhaust note for under $50k MSR... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Heavy naturally aspirated V8 architecture yields below-average fuel economy ratings averaging 15 combined MPG; The under... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
