BMW X7 vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
BMW X7
$90,600
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing BMW X7 vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. Honda CR-V offers the strongest value on price. BMW X7 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
BMW X7
Best Value
Honda CR-V
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
BMW X7
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
BMW X7
$90,600
Rating: 4.8/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
BMW X7 |
Honda CR-V |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | BMW | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | X7 | CR-V | Silverado 1500 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | Suv | — |
| Body Style | Full-Size 3-Row Luxury SUV | Compact Crossover SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | $90,600 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $53,599 – $54,800 |
| MSRP | $90,600 | $38,650 | $54,800 |
| Dealer Price | $88,500 | $37,299 | $52,499 |
| Engine | 3.0L Turbocharged Inline-6 48V Mild-Hybrid | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 |
| Horsepower | 375 hp | 190 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque | 398 lb-ft | 179 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 5.6 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 130 mph | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline (Mild-Hybrid) | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 23 MPG Combined (21 City / 25 Hwy) | 29 MPG combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | Low Emissions Vehicle | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 48V Mild-Hybrid Battery | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 142 | 1340 | 870 |
| Performance Score | 9.0 | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 9.8 | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | BMW Active Driving Assistant | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 21 mpg | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Technology Score | 9.7 | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Value Score | 8.7 | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Pros | Silky smooth and responsive 375 hp inline-6 engine with 48V mild-hybrid boost; Aggressive M Sport exterior body styling... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... |
| Cons | Split headlight front-end styling remains polarizing for some traditionalists; Third-row cargo space is tight when all s... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... |
