BMW i4 vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
BMW i4
$57,900
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing BMW i4 vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. Honda CR-V offers the strongest value on price. BMW i4 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
BMW i4
Best Value
Honda CR-V
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
BMW i4
$57,900
Rating: 9.5/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
BMW i4 |
Honda CR-V |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | BMW | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | i4 | CR-V | Silverado 1500 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | Suv | — |
| Body Style | 4-door gran coupe hatchback | Compact Crossover SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | $57,900 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $53,599 – $54,800 |
| MSRP | $57,900 | $38,650 | $54,800 |
| Dealer Price | $54,345 | $37,299 | $52,499 |
| Engine | Current-Excited Synchronous AC Rear Electric Motor | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 |
| Horsepower | 335 | 190 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque | 317 lb-ft | 179 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 5.5s 0-60 mph | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 118 mph | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | — | 29 MPG combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) |
| Range (EV) | 333 miles | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 83.9 kWh Liquid-Cooled Lithium-Ion Battery Pack | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | 205 kW DC Fast Charge Capability (10% to 80% in 30 minutes) | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 9.5/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1340 | 870 |
| Performance Score | 8.9 | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 9.2 | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | — | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Fuel Economy Score | — | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Technology Score | Silicon Carbide High-Efficiency Semiconductors | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Value Score | — | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Pros | Upgraded silicon carbide inverter delivers much higher real-world energy efficiency and extended driving distance parame... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... |
| Cons | Rear pass-through legroom and bench space feel slightly cramped due to shared internal ICE chassis constraints; Steering... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... |
