Volvo XC40 vs Toyota Corolla
Volvo XC40
$45,295
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Volvo XC40 vs Toyota Corolla. Toyota Corolla offers the strongest value on price. Volvo XC40 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Volvo XC40
Best Value
Toyota Corolla
Fuel Economy
Toyota Corolla
Performance
Volvo XC40
Toyota Corolla
4.6/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Volvo XC40
$45,295
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
Rating: 4.6/10
| Specification |
Volvo XC40 |
Toyota Corolla |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Volvo | Toyota |
| Model | XC40 | Corolla |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Compact Sedan |
| Current Price | $45,295 | $28,799 – $29,500 |
| MSRP | $45,295 | $29,500 |
| Dealer Price | $43,900 | $28,299 |
| Engine | 2.0L Turbocharged Inline 4-Cylinder with 48V Mild Hybrid | 2.0L Dynamic Force Inline-4 |
| Horsepower | 247 hp @ 5,400 rpm (194 hp B4 FWD) | 169 hp |
| Torque | 258 lb-ft @ 1,800-4,800 rpm (221 lb-ft B4 FWD) | 151 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 6.1 sec (0-60 mph B5 AWD / 8.1 sec B4 FWD) | Approx. 8.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 112 mph (electronically limited) | Approx. 118 mph |
| Fuel Type | Premium Unleaded Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 26 MPGe combined (23 City / 30 Hwy B5 AWD) | 35 MPG combined |
| Range (EV) | 425 miles total highway tank range | N/A |
| Emissions | 315 g/mi CO2 | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 12V starter battery + 48V mild-hybrid lithium-ion battery | N/A |
| Charging | Self-charging regenerative braking | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.6/10 |
| Community Reviews | 910 | 1680 |
| Performance Score | 8.5 | 8.0 |
| Comfort Score | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | Volvo City Safety Suite | 9.3 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.7 | 9.2 |
| Technology Score | 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Value Score | 9.0 | 9.1 |
| Pros | Industry-leading active and passive safety features backed by Top Safety Pick+ ratings; Native Google built-in software... | Excellent reliability reputation; Strong fuel economy; Comprehensive standard safety features; Affordable ownership and... |
| Cons | 9.0-inch vertical screen is smaller than newer curved displays found in some German rivals; Climate controls are embedde... | Rear-seat space is moderate for tall adults; Performance is adequate but not sporty; Some premium tech requires higher t... |
