Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Honda CR-V vs Smart Smart #1
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Smart Smart #1
$67,900
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Honda CR-V vs Smart Smart #1. Honda CR-V offers the strongest value on price. Honda CR-V leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Honda CR-V
Best Value
Honda CR-V
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Smart Smart #1
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Smart Smart #1
$67,900
Rating: 4.6/10
| Specification |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
Honda CR-V |
Smart Smart #1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Chevrolet | Honda | Smart |
| Model | Silverado 1500 | CR-V | Smart #1 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | Suv | Ev |
| Body Style | Full-Size Pickup Truck | Compact Crossover SUV | Compact SUV |
| Current Price | $53,599 – $54,800 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $67,900 |
| MSRP | $54,800 | $38,650 | $67,900 |
| Dealer Price | $52,499 | $37,299 | $66,500 |
| Engine | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | Dual Motor AWD |
| Horsepower | 355 hp | 190 hp | 428 hp (315 kW) |
| Torque | 383 lb-ft | 179 lb-ft | 543 lb-ft equivalents / 543 Nm |
| 0–60 mph | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | 3.9 sec (0-100 km/h) |
| Top Speed | Approx. 112 mph | Approx. 116 mph | 180 km/h (112 mph) |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline | Electric |
| Mileage / MPG | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) | 29 MPG combined | 18.2 kWh/100km (WLTP) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A | 400 km WLTP (249 miles) |
| Emissions | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | 0 g/km |
| Battery | N/A | N/A | 66 kWh |
| Charging | N/A | N/A | 150 kW DC (10-80% in 30 min) |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.6/10 |
| Community Reviews | 870 | 1340 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 8.8 | 8.2 | 9.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.6 | 9.2 | 8.5 |
| Safety Score | 8.9 | 9.4 | 9.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 7.9 | 9.0 | 8.2 |
| Technology Score | 9.0 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.7 | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Pros | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Ferocious 3.9-second 0-100 km/h acceleration; Dual-motor AWD traction and control; Standard 22 kW AC onboard charger; St... |
| Cons | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Reduced driving range compared to standard RWD variants; Firm ride quality due to sports tuning; Higher price premium ov... |
