Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Ferrari 296 vs Honda CR-V
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Ferrari 296
$380,000
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Ferrari 296 vs Honda CR-V. Honda CR-V offers the strongest value on price. Ferrari 296 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Ferrari 296
Best Value
Honda CR-V
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Ferrari 296
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
Ferrari 296
$380,000
Rating: 4.9/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
Ferrari 296 |
Honda CR-V |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Chevrolet | Ferrari | Honda |
| Model | Silverado 1500 | 296 | CR-V |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — | Suv |
| Body Style | Full-Size Pickup Truck | Coupe | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $53,599 – $54,800 | $380,000 | $37,899 – $38,650 |
| MSRP | $54,800 | $380,000 | $38,650 |
| Dealer Price | $52,499 | $375,000 | $37,299 |
| Engine | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 | 3.0L Twin-Turbocharged 120° V6 + Electric Motor | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 |
| Horsepower | 355 hp | 830 hp | 190 hp |
| Torque | 383 lb-ft | 546 lb-ft (740 Nm) | 179 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) | 2.8 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | Approx. 112 mph | 205 mph (330 km/h) | Approx. 116 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Hybrid / Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) | Combined hybrid fuel economy approx. 20-25 mpg | 29 MPG combined |
| Range (EV) | N/A | 15 miles (25 km) | N/A |
| Emissions | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Low emission hybrid compliance | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | N/A | 7.45 kWh lithium-ion | N/A |
| Charging | N/A | Plug-in onboard charging | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.9/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 870 | 45 | 1340 |
| Performance Score | 8.8 | 10.0 | 8.2 |
| Comfort Score | 8.6 | 8.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 8.9 | 9.0 | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 7.9 | 7.5 | 9.0 |
| Technology Score | 9.0 | 9.5 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.7 | 8.5 | 9.0 |
| Pros | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... | Blistering 830 hp hybrid powertrain; Instantaneous throttle response with zero turbo lag; Advanced active aerodynamics a... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... |
| Cons | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... | Exclusively high price tag and limited availability; Minimal cargo and storage space; Complex infotainment and digital i... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... |
