Aston Martin DBX vs Toyota Corolla
Aston Martin DBX
$265,000
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Aston Martin DBX vs Toyota Corolla. Toyota Corolla offers the strongest value on price. Aston Martin DBX leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Aston Martin DBX
Best Value
Toyota Corolla
Fuel Economy
Toyota Corolla
Performance
Aston Martin DBX
Toyota Corolla
4.6/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Aston Martin DBX
$265,000
Rating: 4.8/10
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
Rating: 4.6/10
| Specification |
Aston Martin DBX |
Toyota Corolla |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Aston Martin | Toyota |
| Model | DBX | Corolla |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Compact Sedan |
| Current Price | $265,000 | $28,799 – $29,500 |
| MSRP | $265,000 | $29,500 |
| Dealer Price | $258,000 | $28,299 |
| Engine | 4.0L Twin-Turbo V8 | 2.0L Dynamic Force Inline-4 |
| Horsepower | 697 hp | 169 hp |
| Torque | 664 lb-ft | 151 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 3.1 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 8.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 193 mph | Approx. 118 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 16 mpg combined | 35 MPG combined |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | 312 g/km | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.6/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1680 |
| Performance Score | 9.6 | 8.0 |
| Comfort Score | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | 9.0 | 9.3 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 6.5 | 9.2 |
| Technology Score | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Value Score | 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Pros | Brutal twin-turbo V8 performance; Incredible cornering agility and body control; Exquisite handcrafted interior material... | Excellent reliability reputation; Strong fuel economy; Comprehensive standard safety features; Affordable ownership and... |
| Cons | Extremely high purchase and maintenance costs; Poor fuel economy; Infotainment software lags behind key German competito... | Rear-seat space is moderate for tall adults; Performance is adequate but not sporty; Some premium tech requires higher t... |
