Toyota Land Cruiser 250 vs Toyota Corolla
Toyota Land Cruiser 250
$57,200
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Toyota Land Cruiser 250 vs Toyota Corolla. Toyota Corolla offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Land Cruiser 250 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Land Cruiser 250
Best Value
Toyota Corolla
Fuel Economy
Toyota Corolla
Performance
Toyota Land Cruiser 250
Toyota Corolla
4.6/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Toyota Land Cruiser 250
$57,200
Rating: 8.8/10
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
Rating: 4.6/10
| Specification |
Toyota Land Cruiser 250 |
Toyota Corolla |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Toyota | Toyota |
| Model | Land Cruiser 250 | Corolla |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | 5-door midsize body-on-frame SUV | Compact Sedan |
| Current Price | $57,200 | $28,799 – $29,500 |
| MSRP | $57,200 | $29,500 |
| Dealer Price | — | $28,299 |
| Engine | 2.4-liter turbocharged inline-four i-FORCE MAX hybrid | 2.0L Dynamic Force Inline-4 |
| Horsepower | 326 | 169 hp |
| Torque | 465 lb-ft | 151 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | Approximately 6.5 seconds 0-60 mph | Approx. 8.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | Approximately 105 mph | Approx. 118 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline-electric hybrid | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 23 mpg combined EPA estimated | 35 MPG combined |
| Range (EV) | Not applicable | N/A |
| Emissions | Not officially specified in the US press material | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | Nickel-metal hydride hybrid battery | N/A |
| Charging | Self-charging regenerative hybrid system | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 8.8/10 | 4.6/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1680 |
| Performance Score | 8.7 | 8.0 |
| Comfort Score | 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | 9.0 | 9.3 |
| Fuel Economy Score | — | 9.2 |
| Technology Score | 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Value Score | 8.5 | 9.1 |
| Pros | Excellent off-road capability; Strong hybrid torque; Standard full-time four-wheel drive; Robust body-on-frame construct... | Excellent reliability reputation; Strong fuel economy; Comprehensive standard safety features; Affordable ownership and... |
| Cons | Only five seats in the North American version; Firm truck-based ride; Premium starting price; Less cargo flexibility tha... | Rear-seat space is moderate for tall adults; Performance is adequate but not sporty; Some premium tech requires higher t... |