Skip to main content

Lexus GX vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500

Lexus GX $83,445
Honda CR-V $37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 $53,599 – $54,800

AI Comparison Summary

Comparing Lexus GX vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. Honda CR-V offers the strongest value on price. Lexus GX leads on expert rating.

Category Winners

Overall Winner Lexus GX
Best Value Honda CR-V
Top Rated Lexus GX
Fuel Economy Honda CR-V
Performance Chevrolet Silverado 1500

Visual Comparison

Category Radar

Price & Reviews

Model Year

Expert Rating

Lexus GX

Lexus GX

$83,445
Rating: 4.8/10
Honda CR-V

Honda CR-V

$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500

Chevrolet Silverado 1500

$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
Server CSV Export PDF
Specification Lexus
GX
Honda
CR-V
Chevrolet
Silverado 1500
Brand Lexus Honda Chevrolet
Model GX CR-V Silverado 1500
Year 2026 2026 2026
Type Suv
Body Style Mid-Size Luxury Off-Road SUV Compact Crossover SUV Full-Size Pickup Truck
Current Price $83,445 $37,899 – $38,650 $53,599 – $54,800
MSRP $83,445 $38,650 $54,800
Dealer Price $81,500 $37,299 $52,499
Engine 3.4L Twin-Turbo V6 Gas 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 5.3L EcoTec3 V8
Horsepower 349 hp 190 hp 355 hp
Torque 479 lb-ft 179 lb-ft 383 lb-ft
0–60 mph 6.2 sec (0-60 mph) Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph)
Top Speed 112 mph Approx. 116 mph Approx. 112 mph
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline Gasoline
Mileage / MPG 17 MPG Combined (15 City / 21 Hwy) 29 MPG combined 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent)
Range (EV) N/A N/A N/A
Emissions LEV3-ULEV70 Certified Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards
Battery N/A N/A N/A
Charging N/A N/A N/A
Expert Rating 4.8/10 4.7/10 4.5/10
Community Reviews 178 1340 870
Performance Score 9.3 8.2 8.8
Comfort Score 9.6 9.2 8.6
Safety Score 9.9 9.4 8.9
Fuel Economy Score 15 mpg 9.0 7.9
Technology Score 9.6 8.8 9.0
Value Score 8.9 9.0 8.7
Pros Potent 349 hp twin-turbo V6 engine with 479 lb-ft torque and 9,063 lb towing capacity; Exclusive E-KDSS disengages anti-... Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment...
Cons Fuel economy (17 MPG Combined) is low, requiring premium fuel; Does not offer a third row (strictly 5-passenger to maxim... Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to...