Dodge Durango vs Toyota Camry
Dodge Durango
$49,995
Toyota Camry
$37,999 – $38,750
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Dodge Durango vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Dodge Durango leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Dodge Durango
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Dodge Durango
Toyota Camry
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Dodge Durango
$49,995
Rating: 8.5/10
Toyota Camry
$37,999 – $38,750
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Dodge Durango |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Dodge | Toyota |
| Model | Durango | Camry |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Suv | — |
| Body Style | 4-door performance mid-size suv | Midsize Sedan |
| Current Price | $49,995 | $37,999 – $38,750 |
| MSRP | $49,995 | $38,750 |
| Dealer Price | $48,500 | $37,499 |
| Engine | 6.4L 392 HEMI SRT naturally aspirated V8 | 2.5L Hybrid Inline-4 |
| Horsepower | 475 | 232 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 470 lb-ft @ 4300 RPM | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 4.4s 0-60 mph | Approx. 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 160 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Premium Unleaded Recommended | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | — | 44 MPG combined (AWD est.) |
| Range (EV) | 0 miles | N/A |
| Emissions | EPA Certified | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | Conventional 12V Maintenance-Free Heavy-Duty Battery | Hybrid traction battery (Li-ion, trim dependent) |
| Charging | Not Applicable | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 8.5/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1485 |
| Performance Score | 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Comfort Score | 8.4 | 9.0 |
| Safety Score | — | Toyota Safety Sense 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | — | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Value Score | — | 9.2 |
| Pros | Standard 392 cubic-inch V8 provides incredible, instant power delivery and a distinctive exhaust note for under $50k MSR... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Smooth and quiet daily driving manners; Strong standard safety suite; Updated infotainmen... |
| Cons | Heavy naturally aspirated V8 architecture yields below-average fuel economy ratings averaging 15 combined MPG; The under... | No non-hybrid engine option; Rear headroom tighter for very tall passengers; Top trims can get expensive; Sporty driving... |
