Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Honda CR-V vs Nissan Rogue
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Nissan Rogue
$36,599 – $37,250
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Honda CR-V vs Nissan Rogue. Nissan Rogue offers the strongest value on price. Honda CR-V leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Honda CR-V
Best Value
Nissan Rogue
Fuel Economy
Nissan Rogue
Performance
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Nissan Rogue
$36,599 – $37,250
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
Honda CR-V |
Nissan Rogue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Chevrolet | Honda | Nissan |
| Model | Silverado 1500 | CR-V | Rogue |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | Suv | Suv |
| Body Style | Full-Size Pickup Truck | Compact Crossover SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $53,599 – $54,800 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $36,599 – $37,250 |
| MSRP | $54,800 | $38,650 | $37,250 |
| Dealer Price | $52,499 | $37,299 | $35,999 |
| Engine | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 1.5L VC-Turbo Inline-3 |
| Horsepower | 355 hp | 190 hp | 201 hp |
| Torque | 383 lb-ft | 179 lb-ft | 225 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 7.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | Approx. 112 mph | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 118 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) | 29 MPG combined | 31 MPG combined (AWD est.) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 870 | 1340 | 990 |
| Performance Score | 8.8 | 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Comfort Score | 8.6 | 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | 8.9 | 9.4 | 9.2 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 7.9 | 9.0 | 8.9 |
| Technology Score | 9.0 | 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Value Score | 8.7 | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Pros | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Good real-world fuel efficiency; Comfort-focused ride quality; Strong standard safety features; Flexible and usable carg... |
| Cons | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | CVT feel may not suit all drivers; Performance is adequate, not sporty; Some premium features reserved for top trims; Th... |
