Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Honda CR-V vs Kia Sorento Hybrid
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Kia Sorento Hybrid
$47,190
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Honda CR-V vs Kia Sorento Hybrid. Honda CR-V offers the strongest value on price. Kia Sorento Hybrid leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Kia Sorento Hybrid
Best Value
Honda CR-V
Fuel Economy
Kia Sorento Hybrid
Performance
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Kia Sorento Hybrid
$47,190
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
Honda CR-V |
Kia Sorento Hybrid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Chevrolet | Honda | Kia |
| Model | Silverado 1500 | CR-V | Sorento Hybrid |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | Suv | — |
| Body Style | Full-Size Pickup Truck | Compact Crossover SUV | SUV |
| Current Price | $53,599 – $54,800 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $47,190 |
| MSRP | $54,800 | $38,650 | $47,190 |
| Dealer Price | $52,499 | $37,299 | $45,900 |
| Engine | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 1.6L Intercooled Turbo Gas/Electric Hybrid I-4 |
| Horsepower | 355 hp | 190 hp | 227 hp @ 5,500 rpm |
| Torque | 383 lb-ft | 179 lb-ft | 258 lb-ft @ 1,500 - 4,500 rpm |
| 0–60 mph | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | 7.5 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | Approx. 112 mph | Approx. 116 mph | 120 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline | Regular Unleaded Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) | 29 MPG combined | 34 MPG Combined (32 City / 35 Hwy) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A | Short low-speed EV drive mode |
| Emissions | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle (SULEV30) |
| Battery | N/A | N/A | 1.5 kWh Lithium-ion Traction Battery |
| Charging | N/A | N/A | Self-charging regenerative braking system |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 870 | 1340 | 890 |
| Performance Score | 8.8 | 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Comfort Score | 8.6 | 9.2 | 9.4 |
| Safety Score | 8.9 | 9.4 | Top Safety Pick+ |
| Fuel Economy Score | 7.9 | 9.0 | 9.6 |
| Technology Score | 9.0 | 8.8 | 9.5 |
| Value Score | 8.7 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Impressive 34 MPG combined efficiency with standard All-Wheel Drive; Rugged X-Line styling with 8.2 inches of ground cle... |
| Cons | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | 3rd-row legroom is tighter than in full-size midsize SUVs like the Telluride; Cargo volume behind the 3rd row is modest... |
