Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Ford F-150 Lightning vs Honda CR-V
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Ford F-150 Lightning
$63,345
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Ford F-150 Lightning vs Honda CR-V. Honda CR-V offers the strongest value on price. Honda CR-V leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Honda CR-V
Best Value
Honda CR-V
Fuel Economy
Ford F-150 Lightning
Performance
Ford F-150 Lightning
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
Ford F-150 Lightning
$63,345
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
Ford F-150 Lightning |
Honda CR-V |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Chevrolet | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Silverado 1500 | F-150 Lightning | CR-V |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | Ev | Suv |
| Body Style | Full-Size Pickup Truck | Full-size pickup truck | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $53,599 – $54,800 | $63,345 | $37,899 – $38,650 |
| MSRP | $54,800 | $63,345 | $38,650 |
| Dealer Price | $52,499 | — | $37,299 |
| Engine | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 | Dual eMotor, front and rear mounted | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 |
| Horsepower | 355 hp | 536 hp (planned STX) | 190 hp |
| Torque | 383 lb-ft | 775 lb-ft (planned STX) | 179 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) | Mid-4-second 0-60 mph carryover estimate; not finalized for 2026 STX | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | Approx. 112 mph | Not officially published for the planned 2026 STX | Approx. 116 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) | EPA MPGe not finalized; targeted 290-mile driving range | 29 MPG combined |
| Range (EV) | N/A | Targeted 290 miles EPA-estimated (planned) | N/A |
| Emissions | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | 0 g/mi tailpipe emissions for the planned battery-electric model | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | N/A | 123 kWh usable extended-range lithium-ion battery (planned) | N/A |
| Charging | N/A | 11.5 kW Level 2 peak; 2026 DC fast-charge time not finalized | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | — | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 870 | 0 | 1340 |
| Performance Score | 8.8 | 0.0 | 8.2 |
| Comfort Score | 8.6 | 0.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 8.9 | 0.0 | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 7.9 | 0.0 | 9.0 |
| Technology Score | 9.0 | 0.0 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.7 | 0.0 | 9.0 |
| Pros | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... | Planned 123 kWh usable extended-range battery; Planned 536 hp and 775 lb-ft dual-motor output; Targeted 290-mile EPA-est... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... |
| Cons | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... | Canceled before normal 2026 retail production; Final EPA MPGe and charging certification were not issued; No current dea... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... |
